aurareturn 16 hours ago

I've never once wished my Macbook has a touch screen. I think it's a waste of money, technical resources, and maintenance needed to enable touch on macOS.

  • jki275 13 hours ago

    Completely agree, it's a waste to make a laptop screen touchable.

    If there is really a touch "screen" requirement, I would put a screen under the trackpad -- that would be more useful for me at least. I think somebody tried that and it pretty much flopped though.

jgrahamc 15 hours ago

It's interesting that some of the commentators here are very, very against touch screens on a laptop. I use a MacBook Pro and a Panasonic Toughbook (https://blog.jgc.org/2025/07/ode-to-anti-mac-panasonic-tough...). The Panasonic has a touch screen and I love being able to touch a window to bring it to the foreground and use my finger instead of the mouse. It works well for "I want the input point to be here".

abhijitshanbhag 10 hours ago

I don't really understand, like are they seriously so out of ideas at the moment that they are just doing stuff like this and call it a day?

HardwareLust 16 hours ago

Jobs was right, as usual. It's a useless feature nobody wants other than Apple's marketing department.

duxup 16 hours ago

I’ve had laptops with touchscreens and without and I never noticed a difference / didn’t use them.

detaro 16 hours ago

IMHO a macOS-capable iPad Pro would be the more elegant path.

markx2 15 hours ago

To make a screen that is designed for touch will mean thicker heavier screens which has to impact the width surely?

Or will we see "You are touching it wrong"?